Methodological choices of HR research conducted in Asia

Karin Sanders (), Julie A. Cogin () and Cai-Hui Veronica Lin ()
Additional contact information
Karin Sanders: University of New South Wales
Julie A. Cogin: University of New South Wales
Cai-Hui Veronica Lin: Queen’s University

Frontiers of Business Research in China, 2017, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: Abstract A twenty-year study of the Human Resource (HR) practices–outcome relationship has found that more rigorous methodologies have been adopted over time. However, several problematic features such as cross-sectional, single-informant, and single-level designs continue to be adopted (Bainbridge et al., Human Resource Management, 2016). Responding to calls for increased contextualization of research by investigating the relationship between the location of data collection and the methodological choices of researchers, this study answers the question “How unique are the methodological choices of HR research conducted in Asia?” Applying content analysis to 241 published articles, we compare internal, external, construct and statistical conclusion validity of studies collected in North America (n=66), Europe (n=95) and Asia (n=80, including 57 studies from China). Results show that despite similarities in cross-sectional, single-informant and single-level designs across regions, research conducted in Asia is mainly undertaken via field studies, using subjective outcome measures at the organizational level, following a post-predictive design. In addition, studies from Asia are more recent, and show a shorter time gap between data collection and publication. Theoretical and practical implications embedded in the dynamic context of Asia in general, and China more specifically are discussed.

Keywords: Methodological choices; Validity; HR practices; China; Contextualization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s11782-017-0011-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:fobric:v:11:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s11782-017-0011-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://fbr.springeropen.com/

DOI: 10.1186/s11782-017-0011-9

Access Statistics for this article

Frontiers of Business Research in China is currently edited by Jiye Mao, Ziliang Deng and Steven Shuye Wang

More articles in Frontiers of Business Research in China from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().