A comparative study on precision of pairwise comparison matrices

Bice Cavallo (), Jir̆í Mazurek () and Jaroslav Ramík ()
Additional contact information
Bice Cavallo: University of Naples Federico II
Jir̆í Mazurek: Silesian University in Opava
Jaroslav Ramík: Silesian University in Opava

Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2024, vol. 23, issue 2, No 1, 179-198

Abstract: Abstract Pairwise comparisons have been a long-standing technique for comparing alternatives/criteria and their role has been pivotal in the development of modern decision-making methods such as the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process (AHP/ANP), the Best-Worst method (BWM), PROMETHEE and many others. Pairwise comparisons can be performed within several frameworks such as multiplicative, additive and fuzzy representations of preferences, which are particular instances of a more general framework based on Abelian linearly ordered groups. Though multiplicative, additive and fuzzy representations of preferences are widely used in practice, it is unknown whether decision makers are equally precise in the three aforementioned representations when they measure objective data. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to design, carry out and analyse an experiment with over 200 respondents (undergraduate university students) from two countries, Czechia and Italy, to compare precision of the respondents in all three representations. In the experiment, respondents pairwise compared (by approximation) the areas of four geometric figures and then, the imprecision of their assessments was measured by computing the distance with the exact pairwise comparisons. We grouped the respondents in such a way that each participant was allowed to deal with a unique type of representation. The outcomes of the experiment indicate that the multiplicative approach is the most precise.

Keywords: Multi-criteria decision making; Pairwise comparison matrix; Precision; Abelian linearly ordered group (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10700-023-09416-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:23:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10700-023-09416-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10700

DOI: 10.1007/s10700-023-09416-4

Access Statistics for this article

Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making is currently edited by Shu-Cherng Fang and Boading Liu

More articles in Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().