EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cost of peer mystery shopping to increase cultural competency in community clinics offering HIV/STI testing to young men who have sex with men: results from the get connected trial

Victoria L. Phillips (), Ashley Xue, Marné Castillo, Dalia Santiago, Taylor Wimbly, Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman, Rob Stephenson and José A. Bauermeister
Additional contact information
Victoria L. Phillips: Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University
Ashley Xue: Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University
Marné Castillo: The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Dalia Santiago: Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital
Taylor Wimbly: Morehouse School of Medicine
Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman: University of North Carolina
Rob Stephenson: University of Michigan
José A. Bauermeister: University of Pennsylvania

Health Economics Review, 2023, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-6

Abstract: Abstract Introduction Cultural competency has been identified as a barrier to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) populations seeking care. Mystery shopping has been widely employed in the formal health care sector as a quality improvement (QI) tool to address specific client needs. The approach has had limited use in community-based organizations due in part to lack of knowledge and resource requirement concerns. Several mystery shopping initiatives are now being implemented which focus on the LGBT population with the goal of reducing barriers to accessing care. One subset targets men who have sex with men (MSM) to increase uptake of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing. No study investigates the costs of these initiatives. Get Connected was a randomized control trial with the objective of increasing uptake of HIV-prevention services among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) through use of a resource-locator application (App). The initial phase of the trial employed peer-led mystery shopping to identify culturally competent HIV testing sites for inclusion in the App. The second phase of the trial randomized YMSM to test the efficacy of the App. Our objective was to determine the resource inputs and costs of peer-led mystery shopping to identify clinics for inclusion in the App as costs would be critical in informing possible adoption by organizations and sustainability of this model. Methods Through consultation with study staff, we created a resource inventory for undertaking the community-based, peer-led mystery shopping program. We used activity-based costing to price each of the inputs. We classified inputs as start-up and those for on-going implementation. We calculated costs for each category, total costs and cost per mystery shopper visit for the four-month trial and annually to reflect standard budgeting periods for data collected from September of 2019 through September of 2020. Results Recruitment and training of peer mystery shoppers were the most expensive tasks. Average start-up costs were $10,001 (SD $39.8). Four-month average implementation costs per visit were $228 (SD $1.97). Average annual implementation costs per visit were 33% lower at $151 (SD $5.60). Conclusions Peer-led, mystery shopping of HIV-testing sites is feasible, and is likely affordable for medium to large public health departments.

Keywords: Costs; Activity-based costing; Cultural competency; Quality improvement; Young men who have sex with men; HIV-testing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-023-00447-6 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-023-00447-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/13561

DOI: 10.1186/s13561-023-00447-6

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics Review is currently edited by J. Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg

More articles in Health Economics Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-023-00447-6