The Just and the Good

Maurice Salles

Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, 2016, vol. 33, issue 4, No 3, 317-320

Abstract: Abstract The main purpose of these comments on Phelps’s paper in the New York Review of Books is to indicate that the precedence of the good over the just and the pre-eminence at this time of growth and innovations in developed countries are debatable.

Keywords: Social justice; Economic goodness; Inequality; Happiness; Flourishing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D60 D63 D71 O30 O40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41412-016-0017-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:homoec:v:33:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s41412-016-0017-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/41412

DOI: 10.1007/s41412-016-0017-0

Access Statistics for this article

Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics is currently edited by M.J. Holler, M. Kocher and K.K. Sieberg

More articles in Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().