EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Market Darwinism vs. Market Creationism: Adaptability and Fairness in the Design of Greenhouse Gas Trading Mechanisms

Brent Haddad () and John Palmisano ()

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2001, vol. 1, issue 4, 427-446

Keywords: air pollution regulation; allowance trading; emissions trading; greenhouse gases; international institutions; Kyoto Protocol; market-based mechanisms; regulatory program design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1013330417973 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:1:y:2001:i:4:p:427-446

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10784

Access Statistics for this article

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics is currently edited by Joyeeta Gupta

More articles in International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2019-11-06
Handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:1:y:2001:i:4:p:427-446