Estimating weightage and prioritizing major domains of inclusive education assessment framework using analytical hierarchy process

Umesh Kumar () and Haimanti Banerji ()
Additional contact information
Umesh Kumar: Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Haimanti Banerji: Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2025, vol. 16, issue 10, No 15, 3440-3451

Abstract: Abstract Inclusive education, imperative globally, addresses the challenges faced by a substantial population with disabilities. The principles of human factor engineering, centered on creating a holistic, safe, and sustainable environment, directly align with mainstreaming persons with disabilities. Quality education, a vital aspect of sustainable development goals, enhances societal resilience. In India, the absence of facilities, resources, inclusive infrastructure, and a barrier-free environment hampers inclusive school achievement. Additionally, financial constraints in developing countries like India necessitate resource-efficient prioritization strategies. While previous studies have attempted to assess inclusive education, they often lack a structured methodology to systematically prioritize key domains, limiting their applicability in decision-making. This study contributes to an ongoing investigation, creating an assessment framework for successful inclusive education in Delhi’s elementary schools. Using a two-round fuzzy Delphi method, consensus analysis with 25 experts identified 33 assessment indicators across seven domains. To overcome limitations in existing prioritization and weightage identification methods, this study employs both the analytical hierarchy process and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to assign weights to these domains and to prioritize them. A paper-based survey collected responses from 71 education professionals which uses a scale from 1 to 9 for pairwise comparisons between the domains. Results from both methods indicate that “availability of appropriate resources” holds the highest weightage, while “teacher’s attitude” ranks the lowest. This research provides a novel, structured approach to identify the domain weightage and prioritization, addressing existing methodological gaps and enhancing decision-making in inclusive education. The findings serve as a foundation for a scoring methodology of the assessment framework of inclusive education; also this can guide policymakers in strategic planning, resource allocation, and the development of inclusive schools in India. Future work involves developing an assessment framework for effective inclusive education which further improves inclusive education planning and implementation.

Keywords: Inclusive education; Children with disabilities; Priority ranking; Weightage; Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Safety; Enhancing accessibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-025-02869-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02869-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/engineering/journal/13198

DOI: 10.1007/s13198-025-02869-3

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management is currently edited by P.K. Kapur, A.K. Verma and U. Kumar

More articles in International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management from Springer, The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().