Comparing location-specific and location-open social media data: methodological lessons from a study of blaming of minorities on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic

Shiyi Zhang, Panayiota Tsatsou, Lauren McLaren and Yimei Zhu ()
Additional contact information
Shiyi Zhang: University of Leicester
Panayiota Tsatsou: Birmingham City University
Lauren McLaren: University of Leicester
Yimei Zhu: University of Leicester

Journal of Computational Social Science, 2024, vol. 7, issue 3, No 8, 2457-2479

Abstract: Abstract Social media platforms such as Twitter (currently X) have become important sites of public discourse and participation. Researchers have attempted to identify and collect Twitter data within a certain country or region in order to answer research questions within a particular locale. However, location information of tweets is limited. Tackling the case of public blaming of minorities on Twitter in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, we present a method for identifying UK-based tweets and analyse two types of datasets that we collected and processed: (a) tweets with UK location-tags (labelled as location-specific data and referred to as UK datasets); and (b) tweets with UK location-tags and / or user profiles containing potential UK location information (labelled as location-open data and referred to as ALL datasets). The empirical results reveal that the overall sentiments in the two dataset types align in the same direction, but the location-specific datasets contain more extreme discourses (i.e., more positive and more negative sentiments and fewer neutral sentiments). Furthermore, in the location-specific datasets, the range of theme areas is narrower, although the themes still grasp the essence of the discussion about blaming minorities found in the larger dataset. The findings demonstrate strengths and limitations of the two dataset types and that the location-specific data can be suitable especially when the available research resources are insufficient for collecting or processing larger datasets. Nevertheless, we propose that future research may consider comparing smaller and bigger datasets to test differences between these for other topics for which specific locations may be of particular interest.

Keywords: Location tracking; Computational thematic analysis; Sentiment analysis; Twitter analysis; Othering discourse; Blaming of minorities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-024-00311-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00311-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... iences/journal/42001

DOI: 10.1007/s42001-024-00311-5

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Computational Social Science is currently edited by Takashi Kamihigashi

More articles in Journal of Computational Social Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().