EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

‘Slightly disappointing’ vs. ‘worst sh** ever’: tackling cultural differences in negative sentiment expressions in AI-based sentiment analysis

Franziska Sofia Hafner (), Lena Hafner () and Roberto Corizzo ()
Additional contact information
Franziska Sofia Hafner: American University
Lena Hafner: University of Cambridge
Roberto Corizzo: American University

Journal of Computational Social Science, 2025, vol. 8, issue 3, No 3, 31 pages

Abstract: Abstract Advertisers, politicians, and social scientists alike have an interest in the current zeitgeist. With people expressing their sentiments in online comments, the Internet has become a great source for ‘reading’ the zeitgeist via artificial intelligence-based sentiment analysis (SA). At this, negative sentiments are of special concern. They can serve as early indicators for events that require action, such as dropping customer satisfaction, discontent amongst potential voters, or a threat of social unrest. However, due to cultural differences in how negative sentiments are expressed, conventional SA methods typically classify such texts with higher accuracy for some ethnicities compared to others. In this paper, we demonstrate this using a large real-world corpus of Google Maps reviews. Across eight ethnic groups, linguistic patterns vary more starkly in negative (1 star) reviews than in neutral (2–4 star) and positive (5 star) reviews. Consequently, ethnicity-blind SA methods ‘struggle’ to classify negative reviews correctly. To mitigate this problem, we propose a novel SA method, based on balanced training and subsequent ethnicity-conscious fine-tuning. Our approach is simultaneously able to mitigate bias and enhance overall model performance. Thus, we hope to contribute to a more equal appreciation of negative sentiments of ethnically diverse customer-, voter-, or research populations, and, consequently, a more nuanced approximation of the overall zeitgeist.

Keywords: Polarity detection; Sentiment analysis; Algorithmic fairness; Bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-025-00382-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00382-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... iences/journal/42001

DOI: 10.1007/s42001-025-00382-y

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Computational Social Science is currently edited by Takashi Kamihigashi

More articles in Journal of Computational Social Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-23
Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00382-y