Resilience of environmental policy amidst the rise of conservative populism
Nariman Mostafavi (),
João Fiocchi (),
Manuel García Dellacasa () and
Simi Hoque ()
Additional contact information
Nariman Mostafavi: Drexel University
João Fiocchi: University of Pennsylvania
Manuel García Dellacasa: University of Massachusetts
Simi Hoque: Drexel University
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2022, vol. 12, issue 2, No 12, 326 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Sustainability has for long been promoted as a medium for social and economic development, one that focuses on constant availability of natural assets and ecological amenities. By questioning the possibility of reaching a balanced and sustainable state of functioning for social-ecological systems, resilience improves the static framework of sustainability by acknowledging non-linear behavior of complex systems, inevitability of change, and consistent presence of uncertainty. At the core of sustainable development, environmental policy is embedded in the socio-spatial structures that constantly re-organize and breed uncertainty, such as political, economic, and climate uncertainty. These uncertainties create episodes of instability that shock the entire system including the structures of environmental protection. In this article, focusing on the aftermath of 2016 US presidential election and 2018 general election in Brazil, both broadly recognized as political shocks, we highlight the vulnerabilities of environmental protection structures to the rise of conservative populist movements. We attribute these vulnerabilities, partially, to the superiority of market-based instruments, as well as apolitical understandings of resilience under neoliberalism that overlook political instabilities and socio-spatial outcomes of neoliberal restructuring projects. In our assessment, political unpreparedness of sustainability against the right-wing onslaught in the US and Brazil further underlines the need for resilience theory to incorporate sources of political instability in order to protect the environment.
Keywords: Environmental protection; Conservative populism; Environmental policy; Resilience; Neoliberalism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-021-00721-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:12:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13412-021-00721-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13412
DOI: 10.1007/s13412-021-00721-1
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences is currently edited by Walter A. Rosenbaum
More articles in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences from Springer, Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().