Exploring the role of boundary work in a social-ecological synthesis initiative

Barbara Schröter (), Claudia Sattler, Jean Paul Metzger, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Marie-Josée Fortin, Camila Hohlenwerger, L. Román Carrasco and Örjan Bodin
Additional contact information
Barbara Schröter: Working Group “Governance of Ecosystem Services”
Claudia Sattler: Working Group “Governance of Ecosystem Services”
Jean Paul Metzger: University of São Paulo
Jonathan R. Rhodes: The University of Queensland
Marie-Josée Fortin: University of Toronto
Camila Hohlenwerger: University of São Paulo
L. Román Carrasco: National University of Singapore
Örjan Bodin: Stockholm University

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2023, vol. 13, issue 2, No 9, 330-343

Abstract: Abstract Inter- and transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental studies faces the challenge of communicating across disciplines to reach a common understanding of scientific problems and solutions in a changing world. One way to address current pressing environmental challenges is to employ a boundary work approach that uses activities across borders of separated field of research. But how can this look like in practice? In this research brief, we self-evaluated the boundary work approach in a synthesis group on socio-ecological systems, based on an online survey with participants. Here, we discuss how boundary work can be used to integrate the knowledge from natural and social scientists both working on social-ecological systems. We found participants were selected to be acted as boundary spanners and were willing to cooperate for solving multidisciplinary issues regarding the understanding, management, and maintenance of ecosystem services. A social-ecological network analysis framework served as a boundary concept and object for communication and knowledge integration. Being familiar with a joint boundary concept like ecosystem services prior to the working group event supported the communication of participants. These results indicate that synthesis initiatives could strategically leverage boundary work through the careful selection of members, with the inclusion of boundary spanners, as well as prior joint identification of boundary concepts and objects.

Keywords: Social-ecological network analysis; Ecosystem services; Interdisciplinarity; Collaboration; Knowledge coproduction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-022-00811-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:13:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00811-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13412

DOI: 10.1007/s13412-022-00811-8

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences is currently edited by Walter A. Rosenbaum

More articles in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences from Springer, Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().