A new approach for studying social, behavioral, and environmental change through stakeholder engagement in water resource management

Weston M. Eaton (), Kathryn J. Brasier (), Mark E. Burbach (), Stephanie Kennedy (), Jodi L. Delozier (), Sara Esther Bonilla Anariba (), Hannah T. Whitley (), Walt Whitmer () and Nicole Santangelo ()
Additional contact information
Weston M. Eaton: University of Wyoming
Kathryn J. Brasier: Pennsylvania State University
Mark E. Burbach: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Stephanie Kennedy: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Jodi L. Delozier: North Dakota State University
Sara Esther Bonilla Anariba: Pennsylvania State University
Hannah T. Whitley: Virginia Tech
Walt Whitmer: Pennsylvania State University
Nicole Santangelo: Penn State Extension, Penn State University

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2023, vol. 13, issue 3, No 3, 389-403

Abstract: Abstract As public agencies and research institutions increasingly pursue involving stakeholders in making decisions, scholars and practitioners are calling for a more rigorous empirical understanding of engagement processes and their outcomes. However, effective research methodologies for stakeholder engagement research are limited due to the complex challenge of both linking engagement contexts, processes, and outcomes and conducting research in ways that meet both practical and scholarly goals. This paper outlines a method for studying stakeholder engagement contexts, processes, and outcomes in water resource management settings developed through stakeholder engagement efforts in five US project sites. In response to methodological needs identified in diverse scholarship on participatory approaches to water resource management, we describe a longitudinal, mixed-methods, case comparison, and participatory research design, for gathering evidence for social, behavioral, and environmental change outcomes while simultaneously supporting engagement processes. This paper describes the research design and data collection procedures we developed to study change through engagement. This design was intended to allow in-depth analysis of place-specific engagement processes and outcomes, as well as the ability to compare across contexts to illuminate drivers of differences. We present this research design as a framework for others considering similar approaches and conclude by discussing benefits and limitations of the research design and tensions across research on and with stakeholder participants.

Keywords: Stakeholder engagement research; Water resource management; Outcomes; Mixed methods; Longitudinal qualitative research; Participatory research; Comparative design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-023-00835-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:13:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-023-00835-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13412

DOI: 10.1007/s13412-023-00835-8

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences is currently edited by Walter A. Rosenbaum

More articles in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences from Springer, Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().