Human conflicts and the food, energy, and water nexus: building collaboration using facilitation and mediation to manage environmental disputes

Lara B. Fowler () and Xiaoxin Shi ()
Additional contact information
Lara B. Fowler: Penn State University
Xiaoxin Shi: Penn State University

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2016, vol. 6, issue 1, No 10, 104-122

Abstract: Abstract The food, energy, and water nexus represents the interaction of three complicated systems, each of which alone provides plenty of fodder for human conflict. In the USA, environmental laws typically address conflicts arising within each system. For example, the Clean Water Act primarily focuses on controlling end-of-pipe water pollution. However, it is less effective in reducing water pollution from nonpoint sources, which requires intensive collaboration of both public and private entities to address. Sector-based regulatory regimes also have similar limitations in the food and energy systems. Once these three systems are considered together, the implications of policies, plans, and projects on natural resources become difficult to untangle. This paper discusses the benefits and challenges of managing environmental disputes through facilitation and mediation, where a neutral third party is engaged to help design and manage a constructive problem-solving process. An examination of how mediation in particular has been used to address conflicts of different scales in the USA suggests that the use of third-party neutrals should be considered more widely in collaborative efforts to handle conflict at the food, energy, and water nexus. The aid of a neutral third party could greatly enhance the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement and creativity under scientific, legal, and political uncertainties. Dispute resolution processes can also accelerate the creation of productive relationships between citizens, scientists, and non-governmental and governmental agencies to foster innovative and lasting solutions to meet the food, energy, and water needs of the future.

Keywords: Environmental disputes; Dispute resolution; Mediation; Facilitation; Adaptive planning; Post-disaster recovery; Land use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-016-0373-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:6:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-016-0373-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13412

DOI: 10.1007/s13412-016-0373-x

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences is currently edited by Walter A. Rosenbaum

More articles in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences from Springer, Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().