EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Place and exclusion in New York City’s Jamaica Bay

Kristen Van Hooreweghe ()
Additional contact information
Kristen Van Hooreweghe: SUNY-Potsdam

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2016, vol. 6, issue 4, No 14, 753-758

Abstract: Abstract New York City’s Jamaica Bay estuary, part of the National Park Service’s Gateway National Recreation Area, sits along the outer edge of the boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens. Along the shores of Jamaica Bay, many residents have developed strong attachments to their neighborhoods, in large part because of the Bay’s folklore as a fishing and tourist spot. Several families of German, Irish, and Italian heritage claim generational attachments to the Bay, while more recent newcomers stake their claim to the Bay through their hard work in New York City’s blue-collar workforce and their wise investment in private property. Although these place attachments have been important for cultivating residents’ relationships to nature along the Bay, the idea of “place” often rests, either intentionally or not, on the exclusion of “others.” Racial tensions and sentiments are largely rooted in the fear that “outsiders” might destroy the character and benefits of “their place.” Although residential segregation is no longer a legitimate means for excluding others, local residents and government officials have mobilized National Park Service land management policies in such a way as to reinforce a sense of belonging, or exclusion, along Jamaica Bay. In so doing, local residents reinforce the relationship bewteen otherness and pollution and create a sense that certain groups, particularly Hindu practitioners, do not belong in “their place.” The exclusionary potential of place, coupled with the legacy of residential segregation and urban infrastructure development, has meant that local residents are able to maintain their access to the waters of Jamaica Bay by erecting and enforcing social distance. Even those residents and visitors not actively engaged in exclusion still benefit, as fewer people feel welcomed to exploring the “National Park experience” at Gateway.

Keywords: Place; Exclusion; National Park; New York City (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-015-0256-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:6:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-015-0256-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13412

DOI: 10.1007/s13412-015-0256-6

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences is currently edited by Walter A. Rosenbaum

More articles in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences from Springer, Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:6:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-015-0256-6