EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is a non-representative convenience sample of adults good enough? Insights from an economic experiment

Sean F. Ellis (), Olesya M. Savchenko and Kent D. Messer ()
Additional contact information
Sean F. Ellis: Behavior Change for Good, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Olesya M. Savchenko: University of Florida
Kent D. Messer: University of Delaware

Journal of the Economic Science Association, 2023, vol. 9, issue 2, No 8, 293-307

Abstract: Abstract Recruitment of representative and generalizable adult samples is a major challenge for researchers conducting economic field experiments. Limited access to representative samples or the high cost of obtaining them often leads to the recruitment of non-representative convenience samples. This research compares the findings from two field experiments involving 860 adults: one from a non-representative in-person convenience sample and one from a representative online counterpart. We find no meaningful differences in the key behaviors of interest between the two samples. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature demonstrating that non-representative convenience samples can be sufficient in certain contexts.

Keywords: Non-representative convenience sampling; Field experiments; Online recruitment; Representative sampling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B41 C83 C93 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40881-023-00135-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:9:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-023-00135-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/40881

DOI: 10.1007/s40881-023-00135-5

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Economic Science Association is currently edited by Nikos Nikiforakis and Robert Slonim

More articles in Journal of the Economic Science Association from Springer, Economic Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:9:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-023-00135-5