Healthcare Professionals’ Lay Definitions of Hope
David B. Feldman (),
Hooria Jazaieri,
Mark A. O’Rourke,
Marie A. Bakitas,
Robert S. Krouse,
Heidi E. Deininger,
Matthew F. Hudson and
Benjamin W. Corn
Additional contact information
David B. Feldman: Santa Clara University
Hooria Jazaieri: Santa Clara University
Mark A. O’Rourke: Prisma Health Upstate Cancer Institute
Marie A. Bakitas: University of Alabama at Birmingham
Robert S. Krouse: University of Pennsylvania
Heidi E. Deininger: University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Matthew F. Hudson: Prisma Health Upstate Cancer Institute
Benjamin W. Corn: Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Journal of Happiness Studies, 2023, vol. 24, issue 1, No 11, 247 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Although lay beliefs about hope have been studied extensively in college student populations, little is known about how working professionals understand hope. Accordingly, the present study examined lay beliefs about hope among healthcare workers through the prism of two prominent models of hope. A directed content analysis of healthcare professionals’ qualitative responses indicated that the top seven most prevalent lay beliefs about hope were: cognition, implicit goal, agency thoughts, future orientation, likely, affect, and pathway thoughts. Consistent with the dominant perspective in the hope literature, Snyder’s Hope Theory, the three key ingredients of hope—agency thoughts, pathway thoughts, and goals—were all present, albeit to varying degrees. Aspects of Herth’s hope model, another prominent conceptualization, were less supported by our findings. When examining whether agency thoughts or pathway thoughts were more prevalent, there were no significant differences. When examining whether cognition or affect were more prevalent, there was a significant difference such that lay theories of hope typically reflected cognitive rather than affective processes. We discuss implications for existing hope models, implications for healthcare professionals, and future research avenues.
Keywords: Hope; Snyder Hope Theory; Herth hope; Lay beliefs; Lay definitions; Healthcare; Content analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-022-00589-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:24:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10902-022-00589-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... fe/journal/10902/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10902-022-00589-0
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Happiness Studies is currently edited by Antonella Delle Fave
More articles in Journal of Happiness Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().