Debiasing escalation of commitment: the effectiveness of decision aids to enhance de-escalation

Christine R. Ohlert () and Barbara E. Weißenberger
Additional contact information
Christine R. Ohlert: Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf
Barbara E. Weißenberger: Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf

Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, 2020, vol. 30, issue 4, No 4, 405-438

Abstract: Abstract Decision-maker’s tendency to continue with a failing course of action due to sunk costs is a costly bias and failure of managerial decision-making. It is therefore of great interest to find effective countermeasures that address the sunk cost effect, which is one important driver of people’s escalation of commitment behavior. This paper examines the effectiveness of different types of decision aids that aim to reduce the sunk cost effect. In a series of experiments, we first demonstrate that the sunk cost effect even occurs although new unequivocal information on the project’s prospects suggests to change the course, making this bias a robust decision-making error. Then, the effectiveness of different types of decision aids, i.e., warnings and instructions, is tested for de-escalation purpose. De-escalation was found in dependence of the type of decision aid: Using simple warnings that label sunk costs as such and warn about the sunk cost effect was not effective in reducing people’s tendency to continue a failing course of action; whereas specific instructions that alert the decision-maker how to apply normative decision rules for incremental investment decisions effectively reduced decision-maker’s escalation of commitment. But, our findings also indicate that decision-makers have to rely on the instruction at least to a moderate degree. In this regard, we show that decision aid reliance is determined in a sunk cost situation by decision-maker’s internal feeling that prior resources could have been wasted in case of project termination, as they suffer to admit that prior—sunken—investments cannot be recouped anymore. Consequences for management accounting practice are discussed.

Keywords: Escalation of commitment; Sunk cost effect; Debiasing; De-escalation; Decision aids; Warnings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00187-019-00290-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jmgtco:v:30:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00187-019-00290-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/187

DOI: 10.1007/s00187-019-00290-z

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung is currently edited by Thomas Günther

More articles in Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().