EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Business Cycles and HBCU Appropriations

Alberto Ortega () and Omari Swinton
Additional contact information
Alberto Ortega: Whitman College

Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, 2018, vol. 1, issue 2, No 9, 176-195

Abstract: Abstract The demand for postsecondary education has steadily increased since the 1970s. However, state government’s pecuniary investments in higher education have steadily declined over this same period, a decline that is magnified during recessions. This paper examines the effect of state level business cycle measures on the funding of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), relative to other schools. We find that when controlling for school characteristics, HBCU funding is very responsive to the business cycle—particularly downturns. Generally, HBCUs receive less funding than other institutions, but this result is exacerbated during periods of economic downturn. Our results are driven by 4-year institutions—the most common type of HBCU—and dissipates when only considering 2-year institutions. Additionally, when examining the results within each state, we find that during periods of increased unemployment, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, and Virginia provide fewer funds to 4-year HBCUs. We also find that Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia do not appropriate fewer funds to 4-year HBCUs within their states, independent of any unemployment effects. The remaining states have provided less funding for 4-year HBCUs, in general, over the time of our sample. We also examine states that have at least one public 2-year HBCU. The results suggest that Alabama appropriates more funds to 2-year HBCUs, relative to other 2-year schools, during economic downturns and otherwise; South Carolina provides fewer funds to HBCUs during periods of higher unemployment. In discussions with each states’ higher education executive association, we find that the mechanism through which funding disparities persist are difficult to assess due to the influence and autonomy state governors and legislatures possess in determining appropriations.

Keywords: Business cycles; Higher education finance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 H52 H75 I22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41996-018-0009-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joerap:v:1:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s41996-018-0009-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... policy/journal/41996

DOI: 10.1007/s41996-018-0009-5

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy is currently edited by Gary A. Hoover

More articles in Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:spr:joerap:v:1:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s41996-018-0009-5