Evaluating selection methods on hyper-heuristic multi-objective particle swarm optimization

Olacir R. Castro (), Gian Mauricio Fritsche () and Aurora Pozo ()
Additional contact information
Olacir R. Castro: Federal University of Paraná
Gian Mauricio Fritsche: Federal University of Paraná
Aurora Pozo: Federal University of Paraná

Journal of Heuristics, 2018, vol. 24, issue 4, No 1, 616 pages

Abstract: Abstract Multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) is a promising meta-heuristic to solve multi-objective problems (MOPs). Previous works have shown that selecting a proper combination of leader and archiving methods, which is a challenging task, improves the search ability of the algorithm. A previous study has employed a simple hyper-heuristic to select these components, obtaining good results. In this research, an analysis is made to verify if using more advanced heuristic selection methods improves the search ability of the algorithm. Empirical studies are conducted to investigate this hypothesis. In these studies, first, four heuristic selection methods are compared: a choice function, a multi-armed bandit, a random one, and the previously proposed roulette wheel. A second study is made to identify if it is best to adapt only the leader method, the archiving method, or both simultaneously. Moreover, the influence of the interval used to replace the low-level heuristic is analyzed. At last, a final study compares the best variant to a hyper-heuristic framework that combines a Multi-Armed Bandit algorithm into the multi-objective optimization based on decomposition with dynamical resource allocation (MOEA/D-DRA) and a state-of-the-art MOPSO. Our results indicate that the resulting algorithm outperforms the hyper-heuristic framework in most of the problems investigated. Moreover, it achieves competitive results compared to a state-of-the-art MOPSO.

Keywords: Multi-objective particle swarm optimization; Multi-objective; Hyper-heuristics; Leader selection; Archiving; Fitness-rate-rank-based multi-armed bandit; Adaptive choice function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10732-018-9369-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joheur:v:24:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10732-018-9369-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10732

DOI: 10.1007/s10732-018-9369-x

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Heuristics is currently edited by Manuel Laguna

More articles in Journal of Heuristics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().