EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Contestation of State Role in Ethnoscapes: A Contrast Between Community Centrism and Dirigisme in Little India Governance

Nagathisen Katahenggam (), Preveena Balakrishnan (), Victor Eng-lye Wee (), Puvaneswaran Kunasekaran () and Neethiahnanthan M. Ari Ragavan ()
Additional contact information
Nagathisen Katahenggam: Taylor’s University
Preveena Balakrishnan: Penang State Intangible Cultural Heritage Researcher
Victor Eng-lye Wee: Taylor’s University
Puvaneswaran Kunasekaran: Universiti Putra Malaysia
Neethiahnanthan M. Ari Ragavan: Taylor’s University

Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2025, vol. 26, issue 1, No 12, 317-335

Abstract: Abstract This paper examines how ethnoscape contests state functions in touristification. It compares a state-led ethnoscape governance model to a community-based, participatory approach. Although cultural tourism is increasingly recognised for its tourism and commercial value, it also serves to build national identity. Little India in Singapore and George Town, Malaysia, have divergent priorities despite their similar roots. Singapore’s Little India combines ethno-tourism with a state constructed identity. Meanwhile, Little India of George Town is a socio-economic urbanspace with little official intervention. This brings in the question of the function of the state in contesting the various functions of ethnoscapes. Hence, this study will examine how the state places Indian identity for heritage tourism in Singapore and compare it to George Town. It questions ethnoscape governance with a dirigistic state approach. Then, it examines the challenges of a community-led ethnoscape governance against a dirigistic model. Semi-structured interviews were used to study the stories, experiences, and practices of various stakeheholders in both locations using interpretative epistemology to develop relevant themes. Based on the analysis, the rationale for pragmatism in the governance of ethnoscapes is discussed. Also, the viability of paternalistic approach by the state in ethnoscape management in George Town is posited.

Keywords: Little India; Heritage tourism; Dirigisme; Participatory; Ethnoscapes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12134-024-01187-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joimai:v:26:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12134-024-01187-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... tudies/journal/12134

DOI: 10.1007/s12134-024-01187-0

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Migration and Integration is currently edited by Lori Wilkinson

More articles in Journal of International Migration and Integration from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-02
Handle: RePEc:spr:joimai:v:26:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12134-024-01187-0