Optimizing railway crew schedules with fairness preferences
Silke Jütte (),
Daniel Müller and
Ulrich W. Thonemann
Additional contact information
Silke Jütte: International University of Applied Sciences Bad Honnef - Bonn
Daniel Müller: University of Cologne
Ulrich W. Thonemann: University of Cologne
Journal of Scheduling, 2017, vol. 20, issue 1, No 4, 43-55
Abstract:
Abstract Railway crew scheduling deals with generating duties for train drivers to cover all train movements of a given timetable while taking into account a set of work regulations. The objective is to minimize the overall costs associated with a crew schedule, which includes workforce costs and hotel costs. A cost minimal schedule often contains duties that are unpopular to train drivers, and these unpopular duties are often unevenly distributed among crew depots. At the company that motivated our research, for example, train drivers dislike duties that start in the early morning hours. Currently, some crew depots operate large numbers of these unpopular duties, while others do not have any unpopular duties at all. The train drivers perceive this situation as unfair. They prefer schedules with fewer and more evenly distributed unpopular duties across crew depots. In this paper, we define and measure unpopularity and (un)fairness in a railway crew scheduling context. We integrate fairness conditions into a column generation-based solution algorithm and analyze the effect of increased fairness on cost. We also show how increased fairness affects the unpopularity of a schedule. Our method has been applied to test instances at a large European railway freight carrier. Compared to a standard approach that penalizes only the number of unpopular duties in a schedule, we were able to significantly improve schedule fairness with only marginal increases in schedule cost.
Keywords: Crew scheduling; Fairness; Large-scale optimization; Decision support (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-016-0499-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jsched:v:20:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10951-016-0499-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10951
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-016-0499-4
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Scheduling is currently edited by Edmund Burke and Michael Pinedo
More articles in Journal of Scheduling from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().