Agricultural loss due to wildlife: a case study on elephant depredation in a protected area of South India

Meenakshi Negi, Mrinalini Goswami and Sunil Nautiyal ()
Additional contact information
Meenakshi Negi: Centre for Ecological Economics and Natural Resources (CEENR), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC)
Mrinalini Goswami: Centre for Ecological Economics and Natural Resources (CEENR), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC)
Sunil Nautiyal: Centre for Ecological Economics and Natural Resources (CEENR), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC)

Journal of Social and Economic Development, 2023, vol. 25, issue 2, No 6, 350-364

Abstract: Abstract Crop raiding by wildlife is an important form of human–wildlife conflict and has been reported from several protected areas of India. With the growing concerns of forest fragmentation, habitat destruction and expansion of agriculture, the extent of this problem is also getting amplified. The current research is a case study of this issue in Malai Mahadeshwara Wildlife Sanctuary (MM Hills) of Western Ghats in South India, with a special emphasis on elephant depredation. The objective of the study is to understand the types of human–wildlife conflict in selected villages. The study also attempted to assess the direct economic loss due to elephant depredation of crops. Primary data have been collected through household questionnaire survey and focus group discussions in two affected villages (Pacchedoddi located inside MM Hills and Kanchalli located on the fringes of MM Hills). Discussions were also undertaken with the staff of the forest administration. It was revealed that apart from elephants, different types of crops were damaged by boars, rodents and squirrels. Crop raiding by elephants had increased; mainly due to the construction of a dam in MM Hills that acted as a source of water and attracted elephants. Additionally, the availability of water also enabled the villagers to cultivate economically profitable crops, which were also preferred by elephants as they are more palatable leading to increase in elephant raids. The intensity of such raiding was more in Pacchedoddi than Kanchalli. The control measures applied were not fully effective. As a whole, it was found that agriculture was the main reason of human–elephant conflicts in MM Hills and crop loss severely affected the rural people of MM Hills. This formidable conservation issue in the area represents an important ecosystem disservice. It is suggested that this problem should be addressed with a synchronized approach for both conservation and agricultural livelihood with proper compensation schemes and alternate crop choices through government initiatives.

Keywords: Protected area, Crop loss, Human-wildlife conflicts, Conservation and development; Co-existence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40847-022-00230-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40847-022-00230-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40847

DOI: 10.1007/s40847-022-00230-z

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Social and Economic Development is currently edited by M.G. Chandrakanth, D. Rajasekhar, Anand Inbanathan and S. Madheswaran

More articles in Journal of Social and Economic Development from Springer, Institute for Social and Economic Change
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().