EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Can large cities explain the aggregate movements of economies? Testing the ‘granular hypothesis’ for US counties

Fernando Rubiera-Morollón (), Ignacio Del Rosal and Alberto Díaz-Dapena ()
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Fernando Rubiera Morollón

Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 2015, vol. 8, issue 2, 109-118

Abstract: The concentration of economic activity across space is a stylized fact of the literature in regional and urban economics. In the case of the United States (US), only 35 counties at the top of the distribution, out of a total of 3,138, generate more than one third of the country’s total personal income. Furthermore, US urban structure follows Zipf’s law. Under these conditions of concentration, we should presumably find some kind of granular hypothesis as suggested by Gabaix (Econometrica 79(3):733–772, 2011 ). This hypothesis means that the idiosyncratic behavior of the large units should be capable of explaining a significant part of the aggregate shocks. Gabaix found evidence to corroborate this hypothesis for firms: the idiosyncratic movements of the 100 largest firms in the US appear to explain about one third of the variations in output growth. In this paper we analyze whether this behavior is present in the case of urban concentration, as can be expected taking into account the degree of spatial concentration in the economy. We use data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis on personal income, which is disaggregated at a local level, US counties, from 1969 to 2011. The granular residual of the largest cities is calculated and used to explain the US aggregate economic evolution. The overall results provide support for the granular hypothesis: the idiosyncratic shocks to the top counties can explain a significant fraction of the volatility of US aggregate data. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Keywords: Urban concentration; Granular hypothesis; Personal income; United States; R11; R12; E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12076-014-0116-0 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:lsprsc:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:109-118

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/12076

DOI: 10.1007/s12076-014-0116-0

Access Statistics for this article

Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences is currently edited by Henk Folmer and Amitrajeet A. Batabyal

More articles in Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:lsprsc:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:109-118