EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Half dead or more alive than ever? New, old, and (increasingly) redundant literature review formats

Jörn Block (), Leif Brändle, Peter Limbach, Tobias Röth and Christopher Albert Sabel
Additional contact information
Jörn Block: University of Trier
Leif Brändle: University of Hohenheim
Peter Limbach: University of Bielefeld
Tobias Röth: University of Bremen
Christopher Albert Sabel: Erasmus University

Management Review Quarterly, 2025, vol. 75, issue 2, No 1, 993-1008

Abstract: Abstract As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes academic research, this editorial argues that the role of literature reviews is evolving rather than diminishing. We identify three key trends reinforcing their necessity: the deluge of management research, the rise of interdisciplinary research and challenges, and practitioners’ growing demand for evidence-based insights. While AI enhances literature review methodologies, human expertise remains critical for agenda-setting, interpretation, and synthesis. To meet these new demands, MRQ introduces six distinct literature review formats: field-focused, meta-analytic, method-focused, phenomenon-focused, practitioner-focused, and theory-focused reviews. We outline their methodological approaches and intended audiences and additionally introduce blended reviews that combine these formats to offer new opportunities for advancing scholarship. We attempt to guide authors while inviting further dialogue on the future of literature reviews in management research.

Keywords: Literature reviews; Management practices; New data sources; Research design; Scale development; Systematic literature reviews; Theorizing; Meta-research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-025-00513-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:manrev:v:75:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11301-025-00513-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11301

DOI: 10.1007/s11301-025-00513-9

Access Statistics for this article

Management Review Quarterly is currently edited by Thomas Reutterer, Jonas F. Puck, Engelbert Dockner and Anne d'Arcy

More articles in Management Review Quarterly from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-15
Handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:75:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11301-025-00513-9