On the scientometric value of full-text, beyond abstracts and titles: evidence from the business and economic literature
Kevin Riehl ()
Additional contact information
Kevin Riehl: Technical University of Darmstadt
Management Review Quarterly, 2025, vol. 75, issue 3, No 16, 2459-2513
Abstract:
Abstract Are abstracts or titles a good proxy for what an article contains? The majority of scientometric studies have used easily accessible representations of publications such as reference and author lists, citations, keywords, titles, and abstracts, rather than full-texts. However, better accessibility to full-text databases is on the rise. First studies employing full-texts are promising, yet the extent to which scientometric exploration of papers beyond title and abstract is beneficial to gain further insights is still under discussion. In this paper, we analyse the similarity between a paper’s title, abstract and full-text and examine whether scientometric analyses should better rely on full-texts. Our dataset includes 66,392 articles published in 27 leading journals in the business administration and economics literature. We examine the use of these representations in textual analysis, topic modelling and research evaluation. The results suggest that, unlike titles, abstracts and full-texts exhibit significant similarities and can be used interchangeably. While, abstracts contain less extraneous information and approximately 30% less noise compared to full-texts in topic modelling, full-text-based models to explain future number of citations yield a 5% higher explanatory power. Additionally, we recommend considering the influence of diverse writing styles as a textual and rhetorical property, as our analysis demonstrates its significant explanatory power for future publication success.
Keywords: Scientometrics; Topic modelling; Latent Dirichlet allocation; LDA; Textual analysis; Natural language processing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 M21 O31 O35 Z19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-024-00439-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:manrev:v:75:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11301-024-00439-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11301
DOI: 10.1007/s11301-024-00439-8
Access Statistics for this article
Management Review Quarterly is currently edited by Thomas Reutterer, Jonas F. Puck, Engelbert Dockner and Anne d'Arcy
More articles in Management Review Quarterly from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().