What is this thing called misfit? A systematic review into how employee misfit has been defined and researched

Yuwei Sun () and Jon Billsberry ()
Additional contact information
Yuwei Sun: University of Wollongong
Jon Billsberry: La Trobe University, La Trobe Business School

Management Review Quarterly, 2025, vol. 75, issue 4, No 12, 3263-3326

Abstract: Abstract Since 2015, there was a significant surge of interest in employee misfit. These studies demonstrate that although misfit is generally associated with negative outcomes such as organizational exit, social isolation, and depressive states, it can also be viewed more positively as an opportunity for job crafting, growth, and development. In these studies, misfit has been conceptualized, defined, and measured in a myriad of different ways making the interpretation of results problematic. This systematic review investigates how scholars have approached misfit with the goals of documenting and organizing the various ways it has been conceptualized and measured to highlight the main themes and forms of empirical misfit research. The systematic review surfaced 107 studies in 91 papers investigating workplace misfit within the domain of person-environment fit. Close analysis of the design and construction of these studies reveals that misfit has largely been conceptualized atomistically or as value incongruence and there is considerable variation in the way that researchers have defined the concept. It has mainly been measured using atomistic and molar measures rather than molecular ones, which are more suited to misfit investigation. The paper ends with a discussion of the elusiveness of misfit with an argument that it is an umbrella concept beyond definition. Instead, researchers take perspectives on the topic and six different perspectives of employee misfit are identified and defined. Avenues for future research are outlined for each perspective. There is also a discussion of the methodological challenges currently limiting misfit research.

Keywords: Misfit; Person-environment fit; Person-organization fit; Value congruence; Value incongruence; Perceived fit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-024-00461-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:manrev:v:75:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11301-024-00461-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11301

DOI: 10.1007/s11301-024-00461-w

Access Statistics for this article

Management Review Quarterly is currently edited by Thomas Reutterer, Jonas F. Puck, Engelbert Dockner and Anne d'Arcy

More articles in Management Review Quarterly from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().