EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Multi-model comparison of the economic and energy implications for China and India in an international climate regime

Daniel Johansson (), Paul Lucas, Matthias Weitzel (), Erik Ahlgren, A. Bazaz, Wenying Chen, Michel Elzen, Joydeep Ghosh, Maria Grahn, Qiao-Mei Liang, Sonja Peterson (), Basanta Pradhan, Bas van Ruijven (), P. Shukla, Detlef Vuuren and Yi-Ming Wei ()

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015, vol. 20, issue 8, 1335-1359

Abstract: This paper presents a modeling comparison on how stabilization of global climate change at about 2 °C above the pre-industrial level could affect economic and energy systems development in China and India. Seven General Equilibrium (CGE) and energy system models on either the global or national scale are soft-linked and harmonized with respect to population and economic assumptions. We simulate a climate regime, based on long-term convergence of per capita carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, starting from the emission pledges presented in the Copenhagen Accord to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and allowing full emissions trading between countries. Under the climate regime, Indian emission allowances are allowed to grow more than the Chinese allowances, due to the per capita convergence rule and the higher population growth in India. Economic and energy implications not only differ among the two countries, but also across model types. Decreased energy intensity is the most important abatement approach in the CGE models, while decreased carbon intensity is most important in the energy system models. The reduction in carbon intensity is mostly achieved through deployment of carbon capture and storage, renewable energy sources and nuclear energy. The economic impacts are generally higher in China than in India, due to higher 2010–2050 cumulative abatement in China and the fact that India can offset more of its abatement cost though international emission trading. Copyright The Author(s) 2015

Keywords: Climate policy; China; India; Costs; Energy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11027-014-9549-4 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:20:y:2015:i:8:p:1335-1359

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11027

DOI: 10.1007/s11027-014-9549-4

Access Statistics for this article

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change is currently edited by Robert Dixon

More articles in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2020-11-11
Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:20:y:2015:i:8:p:1335-1359