EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Beyond opportunity costs: who bears the implementation costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation?

Cecilia Luttrell (), Erin Sills, Riza Aryani, Andini Desita Ekaputri and Maria Febe Evinke
Additional contact information
Cecilia Luttrell: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
Erin Sills: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
Riza Aryani: Wildlife Conservation Society
Andini Desita Ekaputri: Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)
Maria Febe Evinke: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2018, vol. 23, issue 2, No 7, 310 pages

Abstract: Abstract Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) in developing countries is based on the premise that conserving tropical forests is a cost-effective way to reduce carbon emissions and therefore can be fully funded by international actors with obligations or interests in reducing emissions. However, concerns have repeatedly been raised about whether stakeholders in REDD+ host countries will actually end up bearing the costs of REDD+. Most prior analyses of the costs of REDD+ have focused on the opportunity costs of foregone alternative uses of forest land. We draw on a pan-tropical study of 22 subnational REDD+ initiatives in five countries to explore patterns in implementation costs, including which types of organizations are involved and which are sharing the costs of implementing REDD+. We find that many organizations involved in the implementation of REDD+, particularly at the subnational level and in the public sector, are bearing implementation costs not covered by the budgets of the REDD+ initiatives. To sustain this level of cost-sharing, REDD+ must be designed to deliver local as well as global forest benefits.

Keywords: Benefit sharing; Brazil; Cameroon; Costs of climate change mitigation; Costs of REDD+; Indonesia; Opportunity costs of forest conservation; Peru; REDD+; Subnational REDD+; Tanzania; Tropical deforestation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-016-9736-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:23:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11027-016-9736-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11027

DOI: 10.1007/s11027-016-9736-6

Access Statistics for this article

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change is currently edited by Robert Dixon

More articles in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:23:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11027-016-9736-6