The role of traditional discounted cash flows in the tragedy of the horizon: another inconvenient truth

D. Espinoza (), J. Morris, H. Baroud, M. Bisogno, Arturo Cifuentes (), A. Gentzoglanis, L. Luccioni, J. Rojo and F. Vahedifard
Additional contact information
D. Espinoza: Geosyntec CAT Advisory
J. Morris: Geosyntec CAT Advisory
H. Baroud: Vanderbilt University
M. Bisogno: Inter-American Development Bank
A. Gentzoglanis: Université de Sherbrooke
L. Luccioni: PIMCO
J. Rojo: Sustainability Strategic Advisors
F. Vahedifard: Mississippi State University

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2020, vol. 25, issue 4, No 9, 643-660

Abstract: Abstract Providing decision makers and the investment community with transparent methods to value investments in resilience and adaptation measures to protect physical assets from climate change impacts is becoming increasingly critical. To address this need, this paper introduces and utilizes the decoupled net present value (DNPV) valuation methodology. DNPV is a robust method that can incorporate climate change risk into investment analyses. This paper also discusses how the widespread use of traditional valuation methods such as net present value combined with risk-adjusted discount rates introduces a pernicious time bias effect that magnifies stakeholders’ misaligned interests and investment horizons, leading investors, both public and private, to significantly underinvest in resilience and adaptation. Furthermore, because traditional valuation methods cannot correlate physical risks (e.g., loss of revenue due to physical damage or lost access to an asset) with discount rates, investments to reduce climate change risks are largely considered as expenses that make the investment less attractive. The DNPV method addresses this issue and offers a viable alternative that can consistently and transparently quantify all risks (market and non-market) in terms of cash flows. This allows investors and stakeholders to quantify in monetary terms the potential exposure of physical assets to climate-related hazards and assess the effect of decisions to invest in resilience and adaptation measures. With the aid of a simple numerical example, the DNPV method is used to illustrate how such actions can be treated as quantifiable risk reduction investment opportunities that result in better investment decisions.

Keywords: Climate change; Adaptation; Resilience; DNPV; Risk analysis; Project finance; Valuation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-019-09884-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:25:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11027-019-09884-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11027

DOI: 10.1007/s11027-019-09884-3

Access Statistics for this article

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change is currently edited by Robert Dixon

More articles in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().