Biophysical and socioeconomic factors influencing soil carbon stocks: a global assessment
Sandra Duarte-Guardia (),
Pablo Peri (),
Wulf Amelung (),
Evert Thomas (),
Nils Borchard (),
German Baldi (),
Annette Cowie () and
Brenton Ladd ()
Additional contact information
Sandra Duarte-Guardia: Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA)
Pablo Peri: INTA EEA Santa Cruz, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)-cc332
Wulf Amelung: University of Bonn
Evert Thomas: Bioversity International
Nils Borchard: Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
German Baldi: Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis, Universidad Nacional de San Luis & CONICET
Annette Cowie: NSW Department of Primary Industries
Brenton Ladd: Universidad Científica del Sur
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2020, vol. 25, issue 6, No 10, 1129-1148
Abstract:
Abstract Soil is the most important terrestrial carbon (C) reservoir but is greatly impacted by land use change (LUC). Previous analyses of LUC impacts on soil C have focused on biophysical variables, leaving aside the influence of socioeconomics. The aim of our study was to determine global soil organic carbon (SOC) change patterns after LUC and to assess the impacts of both biophysical and socioeconomic factors that influence stocks of SOC after LUC simultaneously. This was done at a global scale using 817 sites from 99 peer-reviewed publications. We performed separate analyses for cases in which there were gains and losses of SOC. The best predictors of SOC stock changes were the type of LUC and predictors related to sampling depth, climate, biome, soil order, relief, geology, years since LUC, and primary productivity. However, also, socioeconomic variables such as indices of poverty, population growth, and levels of corruption were important. They explained 33% of the variability in SOC on their own and helped improve model accuracy from 42 to 53% when considered in combination with biophysical variables. SOC losses were highly correlated to the type of LUC and social variables, while SOC gains correlated most strongly with years since LUC and the biophysical variables. The analyses confirm that one of the biggest drivers of SOC loss is conversion to agroindustrial scale cropping, whereas with regard to the recuperation of SOC after LUC, the factor “time since conversion” emerged as the most important predictive variable, which must be better integrated in respective policy expectations. We conclude that policies should more than ever incentivize holistic approaches that prevent additional loss of native SOC, while at the same time promoting sustainable intensification of existing agricultural regions. Finally future investments on LUC to regain SOC should be aligned with efforts to alleviate poverty and corruption for their potential to achieve mutual gains in soil fertility and socio-economic parameters.
Keywords: Land use change; Socioeconomic context; Biophysical; Global; Soil organic carbon change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-020-09926-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:25:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s11027-020-09926-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11027
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-020-09926-1
Access Statistics for this article
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change is currently edited by Robert Dixon
More articles in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().