Assessing compounding climate-related stresses and development pathways on the power sector in the central U.S

Angelo Costa Gurgel (), John Reilly, Jennifer Morris, C. Adam Schlosser, Xiang Gao, Mei Yuan and Karen Tapia-Ahumada
Additional contact information
Angelo Costa Gurgel: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Jennifer Morris: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
C. Adam Schlosser: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Xiang Gao: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Mei Yuan: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Karen Tapia-Ahumada: Electric Power Research Institute

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2024, vol. 29, issue 4, No 3, 34 pages

Abstract: Abstract Future configurations of the power system in the central region of the USA are dependent on relative costs of alternative power generation technologies, energy and environmental policies, and multiple climate-induced stresses. Higher demand in the summer months combined with compounding supply shocks in several power generation technologies can potentially cause a “perfect storm” leading to failure of the power system. Potential future climate stress must be incorporated in investment decisions and energy system planning and operation. We assess how projected future climate impacts on the power system would affect alternative pathways for the electricity sector considering a broad range of generation technologies and changes in demand. We calculate a “potential supply gap” metric for each pathway, system component, and sub-region of the US Heartland due to climate-induced effects on electricity demand and power generation. Potential supply gaps range from 5% in the North Central region under mild changes in climate to 21% in the Lakes-Mid Atlantic region under more severe climate change. We find increases in electricity demand to be more important in determining the size of the potential supply gap than stresses on power generation, while larger shares of renewables in the power system contribute to lower supply gaps. Our results provide a first step toward considering systemic climate impacts that may require changes in managing the grid or on potential additional capacity/reserves that may be needed.

Keywords: Power generation; Electricity demand; Climate stress; US Heartland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-024-10119-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:29:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10119-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11027

DOI: 10.1007/s11027-024-10119-3

Access Statistics for this article

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change is currently edited by Robert Dixon

More articles in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().