Lights and shadows of nature-based solutions in the Anthropocene: Perspectives from indigenous narratives in Latin America

María Inés Carabajal (), Fany Beatriz Ramos Quispe (), Sergio Romero Nina (), Héctor Turra Chico () and Ana Watson Jimenez ()
Additional contact information
María Inés Carabajal: National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), University of Buenos Aires
Fany Beatriz Ramos Quispe: IAI STeP Fellow, Belmont Forum; Centro de Acciones por el Desarrollo, la Educación y la Cultura CADEC
Sergio Romero Nina: Activist in Colectivo La Tuqpa, Municipio Llallagua Norte de Potosi, Coordinator of the Madre Tierra y Medio Amiente Programme, Centro de Acciones por el Desarrollom, la Educacion y la Cultura CADEC
Héctor Turra Chico: Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de Temuco
Ana Watson Jimenez: University of Calgary

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2025, vol. 30, issue 1, No 3, 22 pages

Abstract: Abstract The profound transformation of the Earth and its ecosystems within the Anthropocene, have opened up a discussion about how to imagine, plan and implement climate action. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are frequently approached as the human actions aimed at protecting, managing, and restoring ecosystems with the dual objective of enhancing environmental conservation and addressing societal challenges such as sustainable development. In this work, we offer a critical analysis of the narratives from which NbS result from. We contextualize the NbS narrative as emergent from the Anthropocene frameworks and use the lenses of alternative worldviews from Latin America and the Caribbean, which hold other ways of knowing historically neglected by Modern ontologies and epistemologies. As most of the research on NbS has been produced in the Global North, we, a group of Latin American early-career scholars and an Indigenous activist, argue that hegemonic narratives on nature —driven current decision making in global environmental change policies- perversely reinforces exclusionary environmental practices at national and local scales. Such narratives are based on human-centered, Eurocentric and hegemonic scientific worldviews. Drawing on qualitative research that included a critical discourse analysis of existing literature, Indigenous Peoples declarations, and interviews, we examine how NbS is defined within the framework of the Anthropocene and in some cases in contradiction with local Indigenous-based narratives and realities. In this paper, we unpack the need to seek and develop local and pluralistic narratives of climate solutions beyond NbS frameworks in Latin America.

Keywords: Anthropocene; Nature based Solutions; Indigenous-based narratives; Pluralism; SDG; Latin America & the Caribbean (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-024-10189-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10189-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11027

DOI: 10.1007/s11027-024-10189-3

Access Statistics for this article

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change is currently edited by Robert Dixon

More articles in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().