Black swans and white eagles: on mathematics and finance

Sergio Focardi () and Frank Fabozzi ()

Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2009, vol. 69, issue 3, 379-394

Abstract: It is often objected that we cannot use mathematical methods in finance because (1) finance is dominated by unpredictable unique events (the black swans), (2) there are qualitative effects that cannot be quantified, and (3) the laws themselves of finance keep on changing. In this paper we discuss these three objections, offering arguments to reject them. We begin by reviewing the development of the physical sciences, pointing out parallels that are relevant for our discussion. Modern science has abandoned the objective of describing reality and has adopted an operational point of view that regards physical laws as tools to connect observations. Modern science is no longer deterministic, but has accepted a fundamental uncertainty in physical laws both at micro and macroscopic levels. Unpredictable pivotal events exist in the physical sciences as well in finance but this does not lead us to question the use of mathematics in the physical sciences. On the contrary, using principles of safe design, we try to understand how to avoid and contain unpredictability. Financial markets are manmade artifacts with, as actors, a large number of interacting agents. If we so wish, we can reduce the level of uncertainty present in markets: But if we try to do so describing financial markets with simple mathematical laws, we find that these laws are not stable but change over time, eventually with sudden structural breaks. This makes the use of mathematical finance difficult but not impossible. We can forecast human decision-making processes, crucial in forecasting financial markets, at the statistical level in aggregate. From an operational point of view, we have the tools to understand and describe the behavior of large number of interacting agents. At the present stage of development of our science, we need to use the mathematics of adaptive systems, changing mathematical models in function of different market states. However, reductionism to a small number of basic laws remains a fundamental objective of financial economics as it is in the physical sciences. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2009

Keywords: Black swans; Non-linear dynamics; Differential equations; Logical Positivism; Economic reductionalism; Dynamic Stochastic; General Equilibrium models; Adaptive models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00186-008-0243-8 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:mathme:v:69:y:2009:i:3:p:379-394

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/00186

DOI: 10.1007/s00186-008-0243-8

Access Statistics for this article

Mathematical Methods of Operations Research is currently edited by Oliver Stein

More articles in Mathematical Methods of Operations Research from Springer, Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR), Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().