What is behind the search for social acceptability of mining projects? Political economy and legal perspectives on Canadian mineral extraction
Bonnie Campbell () and
Marie-Claude Prémont ()
Additional contact information
Bonnie Campbell: University of Quebec in Montreal
Marie-Claude Prémont: École nationale d’administration publique (ENAP)
Mineral Economics, 2017, vol. 30, issue 3, No 1, 180 pages
Abstract:
Abstract From the dual disciplinary perspective of law and political economy, this papers draws on a select literature to identify (1) two characteristics of Canadian mining rights and regulations which may generate social dissatisfaction, (2) the two main techniques currently implemented in order to answer social demands, including those of indigenous peoples and communities, and (3) three important governance “transformations” emerging from these phenomena. It concludes with a number of lessons. In spite of the ongoing and recent efforts to reform the mining regime in certain provinces or territories, mining rights and regulations in Canada are still based on the free mining principle where mining is paramount to any other activity, be it social or economic. Efforts to respond to dissatisfaction over extraction projects and social demand for changes have focused on strengthening negotiated local economic benefits and a quest for local support in order to ensure the social acceptability of projects in the sector. These phenomena lead to three major ongoing governance transformations: the regulatory stalemate in spite of the need for reform, ongoing shifts in multi-level governance, and the devolution of responsibilities to the private sector. In the context of the stronghold of the free mining principle and negotiated agreements, the focus on social acceptability takes for granted or even reinforces the withdrawal and selective absence of public authorities and overlooks their possible roles and responsibilities.
Keywords: Mining in Canada; Social acceptability; IBAs; Free mining; Regulatory reform; Multi-level governance; Negotiated justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13563-017-0123-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:minecn:v:30:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s13563-017-0123-x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13563
DOI: 10.1007/s13563-017-0123-x
Access Statistics for this article
Mineral Economics is currently edited by Magnus Ericsson and Patrik Söderholm
More articles in Mineral Economics from Springer, Raw Materials Group (RMG), Luleå University of Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().