 The environmental criticality of primary raw materials – A new methodology to assess global environmental hazard potentials of minerals and metals from miningAndreas Manhart (),
Regine Vogt (),
Michael Priester (),
Günter Dehoust (),
Andreas Auberger (),
Markus Blepp (),
Peter Dolega (),
Claudia Kämper (),
Jürgen Giegrich (),
Gerhard Schmidt () and
Jan Kosmol ()
Mineral Economics, 2019, vol. 32, issue 1, No 6, 107 pages Abstract: Abstract Environmental aspects are more and more relevant for raw material policy-making and responsible sourcing strategies. This trend is partly based on growing public awareness of problems and impacts associated with extraction and processing of ores and minerals. Disaster events such as the tailing dam failures in Kolontár (Hungary, October 2010) and Bento Rodriguez (Brazil, November 2015) quite frequently highlight the fact that many mining and processing practices are associated with substantial environmental impacts and risks for the local and even regional environments. However, there is also increasing recognition that the rather devastating environmental performance of many past and current mining projects is a major reason for communities around the world to oppose both the development of new and the expansion of existing mines. Although mining companies constantly have to increase their efforts to secure the social license to operate, many scholars already point out that both environmental impacts and associated social and political reactions are emerging as a decisive factor determining current and future raw material supply. In light of these concerns, raw material policy-making requires solid information on environmental hot spots in mining, as well as on raw materials of particular concern. Whereas indicators and information systems are already well developed for geological, technical, structural, political, regulatory, and economic supply risks, there is currently no holistic method and information system for environmental concerns associated with the mining of raw materials. Although life cycle assessment can provide methodological support for various environmental aspects, it has substantial weaknesses in the fields of ecosystem degradation, impacts on fresh- and groundwater resources, and hazard potentials from episodic disaster events. This paper presents a methodology that aims to fill this gap. Our proposed method provides a system of 11 indicators allowing the identification of raw material-specific environmental hot spots and rankings of raw materials. Although the indicator system is qualitative in nature, its composition and aggregation cover the most relevant environmental concerns arising from mining and allow prioritizing of raw materials from a global environmental perspective. Keywords: Mining; Environmental hazard potentials; Raw material policy; Criticality; Environmental availability of raw materials (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:minecn:v:32:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s13563-018-0160-0 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/s13563-018-0160-0 Access Statistics for this article Mineral Economics is currently edited by Magnus Ericsson and Patrik Söderholm More articles in Mineral Economics from Springer, Raw Materials Group (RMG), Luleå University of Technology |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.