Addressing threats like Covid: why we will tend to over-react and how we can do better
Mark Pingle ()
Additional contact information
Mark Pingle: University of Nevada
Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, 2022, vol. 21, issue 1, No 2, 9-23
Abstract A number of behavioral economic insights suggest we will tend to overreact, individually and collectively, to a new, serious, but low probability health threat, like Covid 19. To respond more effectively to such threats, we should recognize why we will tend to overreact and prepare in advance not to do so. We also should recognize the usefulness in giving lower level governments, non-profits, and less formal communities some ability to respond, rather than presuming we should address a significant threat like Covid using the highest level of government.
Keywords: Covid; Loss aversion; Status quo bias; Certainty effect; Ambiguity; Emotion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11299-022-00288-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:minsoc:v:21:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11299-022-00288-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences is currently edited by Riccardo Viale
More articles in Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences from Springer, Fondazione Rosselli Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().