Comparison of GA-BP and PSO-BP neural network models with initial BP model for rainfall-induced landslides risk assessment in regional scale: a case study in Sichuan, China

Chonghao Zhu, Jianjing Zhang (), Yang Liu, Donghua Ma, Mengfang Li and Bo Xiang
Additional contact information
Chonghao Zhu: Southwest Jiaotong University
Jianjing Zhang: Southwest Jiaotong University
Yang Liu: Southwest Jiaotong University
Donghua Ma: Southwest Jiaotong University
Mengfang Li: Southwest Jiaotong University
Bo Xiang: Highway Planning, Survey, Design and Research Institute of Sichuan Provincial Department of Transportation

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2020, vol. 100, issue 1, No 11, 173-204

Abstract: Abstract With the increase in inclement weather conditions, many countries would experience more and more landslide hazards in the process of planning, designing and construction for engineering projects, especially in the mountainous regions. How to quickly and accurately assess potential landslide risk in a large region (> 10,000 km2) is facing challenge due to its complex geological conditions and large amount of landslides in the region. To optimize the accuracy of the existing models for a large region, in this study, the genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) are, respectively, coupled with the backpropagation (BP) neural network to determine the initial weights and thresholds in the BP neural network, which can be called GA-BP model and PSO-BP model. To show the reliability and accuracy of the new models in large region, the BP, GA-BP and PSO-BP models are evaluated based on root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), Kappa coefficient (k), receiver operating characteristic (ROC), training time and condition factor weights by using 100 landslide samples from Sichuan Province, China. Results show that the RMSE values of the GA-BP model and the PSO model are, respectively, 22.6% and 5.1% lower than those of the BP model; the R2 values of the GA-BP model and the PSO model are, respectively, 24.9% and 6.2% higher than those of the BP model; the k values of the GA-BP model and the PSO model are, respectively, 44.3% and 15.4% higher than those of the BP model, and the areas under ROC of the GA-BP model and the PSO model are, respectively, 32.4% and 9.6% larger than those of the BP model. The GA-BP model and the PSO-BP model have better accuracy in the assessment of the overall risk value and the risk-level classification. The difference of the training time is small, and the sequences of condition factor weights given by the three models are consistent. In general, the GA-BP model is more effective for landslide risk assessment in large region. At last, this study gives proposed models under different engineering conditions, which can increase efficiency of the risk assessment for landslides.

Keywords: Landslide risk analysis; Artificial neural networks; Genetic algorithm; Particle swarm optimization; GIS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03806-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:100:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03806-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03806-x

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().