Coastal vulnerability assessment of Vedaranyam swamp coast based on land use and shoreline dynamics

V. P. Sathiya Bama (), S. Rajakumari and R. Ramesh
Additional contact information
V. P. Sathiya Bama: GOI Anna University Campus
S. Rajakumari: GOI Anna University Campus
R. Ramesh: GOI Anna University Campus

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2020, vol. 100, issue 2, No 17, 829-842

Abstract: Abstract In the recent decades, the 60-km coastal stretch of Vedaranyam swamp located in the southern coast of Tamil Nadu is identified as a major ‘Vulnerable Hotspot’, due to increased land-based infrastructures and associated episodic hazards including floods attributable to heavy rain, cyclones, storm surges, earthquakes and tsunami. In order to assess the impact of the land use/land cover changes (LULC) on the historical shoreline of this geographical area, vulnerability study between the periods 1978, 1998 and 2017 was attempted. The LULC change analysis from 1978 to 2017 indicated significant increase in aquaculture farms, salt pans and settlement areas upon conversion of crop lands, mudflats, coastal dunes and scrub lands especially along the coast. The end-point rate resulting from the shoreline analysis over the study period showed evidences of accretion and erosion ranging from 9.93 to − 2.28 m year−1 while the net shoreline movement transects about − 107.79 to 382.71 m, respectively. Changes in the land uses and shoreline dynamics of the study area were considered as key parameters for the vulnerability assessment of this coast. This analysis will help to create awareness among the people about impacts of land use changes and effects of natural hazards such as coastal erosion, inundation and their consequences which includes loss of life and properties. The stress driving vulnerability parameters, namely sea-level rise, relief, wave exposure, surge potential, were considered for calculating the vulnerability index of the 60-km coastline considered for the study. The outcome of the study indicates that about 6 km of the coast is very highly vulnerable, 45 km is highly vulnerable, and 9 km is moderate vulnerable to episodic natural hazards.

Keywords: Land use/cover; Erosion; Accretion; Sea-level rise; Coastal vulnerability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-019-03844-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:100:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-019-03844-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03844-5

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().