Simple rules for choosing fault planes in almost real-time post-earthquake loss assessments

Mario A. Salgado-Gálvez (), Mario Ordaz (), Benjamín Huerta (), Shri K. Singh () and Xyoli Pérez-Campos ()
Additional contact information
Mario A. Salgado-Gálvez: ERN
Mario Ordaz: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Benjamín Huerta: ERN
Shri K. Singh: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Xyoli Pérez-Campos: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2020, vol. 104, issue 1, No 27, 639-658

Abstract: Abstract Rapid post-earthquake loss assessments require as input the ground motion footprint of the event. These footprints account for the geographical distribution of the seismic intensities, which, at the same time, depend on characteristics of the event such as magnitude, location, depth, focal mechanism, and orientation of the fault plane. For most earthquakes with MW ≥ 5, moment tensor solution and, hence, the characteristics of the two nodal-planes are available. This paper proposes a simple set of rules for choosing the likely fault plane from the two nodal planes, based on a previous characterization of the seismic sources in the area under study that are commonly used in probabilistic seismic hazard analyses. With the selection of the fault plane, a critically required information for generating the parametric ground motion footprint is at hand in a matter of minutes, to be later used in the loss assessment phase. These almost real-time loss assessments are useful for different disaster risk management activities ranging from emergency planning and management to triggers of parametric insurance instruments. The application of this methodology is illustrated for three events, two in Mexico and another in Guatemala, where loss results and their geographical distributions at country level in some cases are highly sensitive to the selection of the correct nodal plane as the fault plane, showing that the proposed rules yield congruent results with the observed and recorded ground motions.

Keywords: Selecting fault plane from nodal planes; Earthquake risk; Real-time loss assessment; Hazard footprints; R-CRISIS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04184-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04184-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04184-5

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().