Exploring the impact of epistemic uncertainty on a regional probabilistic seismic risk assessment model

Petros Kalakonas (), Vitor Silva, Amaryllis Mouyiannou and Anirudh Rao
Additional contact information
Petros Kalakonas: University School for Advanced Studies (IUSS)
Vitor Silva: Global Earthquake Model Foundation (GEM)
Amaryllis Mouyiannou: Partner Re
Anirudh Rao: Global Earthquake Model Foundation (GEM)

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2020, vol. 104, issue 1, No 42, 997-1020

Abstract: Abstract Probabilistic earthquake loss models are widely used in the (re)insurance industry to assess the seismic risk of portfolios of assets and to inform pricing mechanisms for (re)insurance contracts, as well as by international and national organizations with the remit to assess and reduce disaster risk. Such models include components characterizing the seismicity of the region, the ground motion intensity, the building inventory, and the vulnerability of the assets exposed to ground shaking. Each component is characterized by a large uncertainty, which can be classified as aleatory or epistemic. Modern seismic risk assessment models often neglect some sources of uncertainty, which can lead to biased loss estimates or to an underestimation of the existing uncertainty. This study focuses on exploring and quantifying the impact of a number of sources of uncertainties from each component of an earthquake loss model to the loss estimates. To this end, the residential exposure of Guatemala and Guatemala City were used as case studies. Moreover, a comparison of the predicted losses for an insured portfolio in the country between OpenQuake-engine and a vendor catastrophe platform was performed, assessing the potential application of OpenQuake in the (re)insurance industry. The findings from this study suggest that the uncertainty in the hazard component has the most significant effect on the loss estimates.

Keywords: Seismic risk; Epistemic uncertainty; Loss sensitivity; Insured portfolio; OpenQuake (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04201-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04201-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04201-7

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().