EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Exploring the impact of introducing a physical model into statistical methods on the evaluation of regional scale debris flow susceptibility

Jingbo Sun, Shengwu Qin (), Shuangshuang Qiao, Yang Chen, Gang Su, Qiushi Cheng, Yanqing Zhang and Xu Guo
Additional contact information
Jingbo Sun: Jilin University
Shengwu Qin: Jilin University
Shuangshuang Qiao: Jilin University
Yang Chen: Jilin University
Gang Su: Jilin University
Qiushi Cheng: Jilin University
Yanqing Zhang: Jilin University
Xu Guo: Jilin University

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2021, vol. 106, issue 1, No 39, 912 pages

Abstract: Abstract Regional scale debris flow susceptibility is widely evaluated by statistical methods. However, the initiation mechanism of debris flow is not considered, which leads to the neglect of the microtopographic characteristics. To address this problem, we established three novel combined models by introducing the physical model into statistical methods. The integrating models consists of two parts, the statistical models and the TRIGRS model. The eventual results obtained with the integrating model consider both the prediction result of the statistical method for debris flow susceptibility and the mechanism of debris flow initiation. To test the feasibility of the integrating model, three representative statistical models, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Shannon entropy (Entropy) and support vector machine (SVM) were selected to evaluate debris flow susceptibility in Yongji County of Jilin Province, China. The results demonstrate that the performance of the integrated models is significantly better than that of the single statistical model, especially in the local areas. The integrating models (AHP-TR, Entropy-TR, SVM-TR) can generate higher quality debris flow susceptibility maps (DFSMs) than the single model, which clearly reflect the scope and boundaries of the areas which are most prone to debris flow and identify the flat land and valleys between adjacent high-prone areas. It also reduces the overprediction generated by the physical model. In general, combining the statistical methods with the TRIGRS model can maximize the strengths of these models and avoid their weaknesses and obtain the effect of 1 + 1 > 2.

Keywords: Integrating model; Statistical model; Physical model; Debris flow susceptibility mapping; Yongji County (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04498-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:106:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04498-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04498-4

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:106:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04498-4