EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Identifying rainfall threshold of flash flood using entropy decision approach and hydrological model method

Kairong Lin (), Jiaqi Zhou, Ruhao Liang, Xiaozhang Hu, Tian Lan, Meixian Liu, Xin Gao and Denghua Yan
Additional contact information
Kairong Lin: Sun Yat-Sen University
Jiaqi Zhou: Sun Yat-Sen University
Ruhao Liang: Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and HydroPower
Xiaozhang Hu: Pearl River Hydraulic Research Institute
Tian Lan: Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Water Security Regulation and Control for Southern China
Meixian Liu: Sun Yat-Sen University
Xin Gao: Sun Yat-Sen University
Denghua Yan: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower 17 Research

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2021, vol. 108, issue 2, No 2, 1427-1448

Abstract: Abstract Flash flood disaster, with strong suddenness and tremendous destructiveness, is one of the most severe natural disasters in China that seriously threaten the lives and property safety of people and social development. Owing to the complex terrain and limited rainfall and runoff monitoring gauges, it is arduous to effectively prevent and control flash flood disasters in small-sized and medium-sized hilly watersheds. Identifying rainfall threshold, critical discharge and warning periods for flash flood, is critical in disaster prevention in such regions. This study adopted two approaches, the entropy-based decision approach and the hydrological model approach in calculating rainfall thresholds under different antecedent moisture condition (AMC). In particular, the entropy-based decision approach was improved, by using the Frank copula to calculate the multivariate joint distribution of the cumulative rainfall and the corresponding peak discharge. These two approaches were validated in a typical basin, located in the Pearl River Delta in South China that is characterized by frequently heavy rainfall and floods in the monsoon. Results showed that both approaches have the ability to quantify rainfall thresholds. Relatively, the Bayesian method exhibited higher rainfall thresholds, comparing to the other methods. In particular, for AMC I, the utility-entropy risk function method (with λ = 1) exhibited the best-applied practicable forecast lead time of 2.0 h; as for AMC II, the two methods showed the same forecast lead time of 1.5 h, and for AMC III, the hydrological model-based approach showed an optimal forecast lead time of 6.0 h. Meanwhile, the entropy-based approach exhibited the same performance as hydrological modeling approaches, indicating that this method is practicable in flood forecasting. The results would be helpful for floods prevention and mitigation in such small-sized and medium-sized hilly watersheds.

Keywords: Flash flood disaster; Rainfall threshold; Entropy-based decision; Hydrological model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-04739-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:108:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04739-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04739-0

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:108:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04739-0