Spatial comparisons in wetland loss, mitigation, and flood hazards among watersheds in the lower St. Johns River basin, northeastern Florida, USA

Nisse Goldberg () and Russell L. Watkins
Additional contact information
Nisse Goldberg: Jacksonville University
Russell L. Watkins: Threshold Spatial Sciences

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2021, vol. 109, issue 2, No 17, 1743-1757

Abstract: Abstract Wetlands provide invaluable ecosystem services to moderate the effects of flooding. In the United States, Sect. 404 of the Clean Waters Act requires that mitigation of impacted wetlands from issued Environmental Resource Permits (ERPs) occur in the same watershed. This study investigated spatial patterns of impacted wetlands and compulsory mitigation (e.g., preservation and/or purchase of mitigation bank credits) in three watersheds of the lower St. Johns River basin, Florida, from ERPs submitted in 2006–2019. Each watershed was stratified by the Federal Emergency Management Administration’s (FEMA) designated 100-year floodplain, 500-year floodplain, and outside the floodplain. Flood hazards (e.g., projected 2030 Sea Level Rise, seasonal nuisance high tides, and storm surge) were compared among the three floodplain categories with ERP data, age and value of residential structures, FEMA field assessment following Hurricane Irma in 2017, and a composite flood hazard score. Results indicated that wetland loss occurred primarily in the 100- and 500-year floodplains, and wetlands were at greatest risk from projected 2030 SLR and nuisance high tides. These ERPs planned to preserve upland and wetlands by purchasing credits from banks located in areas with low risk of flooding. Older houses were typically in areas with greater flood hazard exposure, with higher home values. This study demonstrated that a watershed evaluation of flood exposure should be considered for future development, regardless of floodplain category. Given the significant social and economic costs from flood damage, community planners should prioritize protection of wetlands and open spaces in areas most vulnerable to flood hazards.

Keywords: Flood hazards; Floodplains; Mitigation; Wetlands (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-04896-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:109:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04896-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04896-2

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().