EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing the effect of future landslide on ecosystem services in Aqabat Al-Sulbat region, Saudi Arabia

Saeed Alqadhi (), Javed Mallick (), Swapan Talukdar (), Mohd. Ahmed (), Roohul Abad Khan (), Showmitra Kumar Sarkar () and Atiqur Rahman ()
Additional contact information
Saeed Alqadhi: King Khalid University
Javed Mallick: King Khalid University
Swapan Talukdar: Jamia Millia Islamia
Mohd. Ahmed: King Khalid University
Roohul Abad Khan: King Khalid University
Showmitra Kumar Sarkar: Khulna University of Engineering and Technology
Atiqur Rahman: Jamia Millia Islamia

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2022, vol. 113, issue 1, No 27, 671 pages

Abstract: Abstract Ecosystem conservation requires monitoring natural resources, such as vegetation, freshwater, and wetland systems, as well as their adaptations to natural and anthropogenic stressors. As a result, the present study intends to assess the effect of future landslide on different ecosystem services in Aqabat Al-Sulbat regions. In the present study, landslide susceptibility maps (LSM) at different return periods as a proxy of future landslide have been generated with integration of ensemble machine learning algorithms. Stacking framework based on bagging, dagging, and artificial neural network (ANN) along with random forest has been proposed to generate LSMs. Also, bagging, dagging, and ANN have been applied individually. Receiver operational characteristics (ROC curve) were used to validate the LSM model against reality. The best LSM predicting model determined by the ROC curve was used to create future LSM maps by combining rainfall at 2–100 year return periods (using Gumble extreme value distribution). The potential loss of ecosystem services value in the Aqabat Al-Sulbat region was estimated. All models anticipate 6–16 km2 and 27–41 km2 of the study region as very high and high land susceptibility (LS) zones, respectively. According to the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve, stacking-bagging outperformed all other models (AUC: 0.91). While the region encompassed by very high LS zones would steadily rise from 2 to 100 year return periods (6.1–20.44 km2). As a result, ecosystem services (ES) would be destroyed as well. The results revealed that the ES generating region with zero value will steadily expand with increasing return periods (39–42 km2) owing to the expansion of high LS zones. The research delivers reliable spatially explicit results in order to influence policy decisions on forest management investment, landslide management, and development activity management as well as replication possibilities in other data sparse places.

Keywords: Machine learning; Landslide susceptibility; Stacking; Data mining; Remote sensing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05318-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:113:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05318-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05318-7

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:113:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05318-7