Susceptibility assessment of earth fissure related to groundwater extraction using machine learning methods combined with weights of evidence
Aihua Wei,
Yuanyao Chen,
Haijun Zhao,
Zhao Liu,
Likui Yang,
Liangdong Yan () and
Hui Li
Additional contact information
Aihua Wei: Hebei GEO University
Yuanyao Chen: Hebei GEO University
Haijun Zhao: Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zhao Liu: Hebei GEO University
Likui Yang: Hebei GEO University
Liangdong Yan: Hebei GEO University
Hui Li: Hebei Geo-Environment Monitoring
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2023, vol. 119, issue 3, No 39, 2089-2111
Abstract:
Abstract The susceptibility of a region to the occurrence of earth fissures is often used to assess the probability of geohazards across an area. The main objective of this study is to discuss and explore machine learning methods for earth fissure susceptibility assessment, including the single machine learning method and the ensemble model. A total of ten affecting factors including elevation, slope, topographic wetness index, rainfall, drawdown of groundwater level, the thickness of Quaternary sediments, distance from rivers, distance to faults, normalized difference vegetation index, and land use were selected. The weight of evidence (WoE) method was first used to determine the quantitative relationship between an earth fissure and its related parameters. The WoE, support vector machine learning combined with the WoE (SVM +WoE), and the random forest combined with the WoE (RF+ WoE) model were then used to classify earth fissure susceptibility. The area under the curve and root-mean-squared error was used to evaluate the three methods and to determine the most optimal approach for earth fissure susceptibility map. The results indicated that the RF+ WoE model had the highest predictive accuracy, followed by the SVM+WoE and the WoE models. The study area was finally classified into regions with very high, high, moderate, low, and very low susceptibility, accounting for 11.20%, 15.66%, 24.13%, 32.60%, and 16.07% of the area. Susceptibility mapping can apply machine learning methods combined with the WoE method for earth fissure assessment.
Keywords: Earth fissure assessment; Weights of evidence; Support vector machine learning; Random forest; Ensemble models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06198-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:119:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06198-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06198-1
Access Statistics for this article
Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk
More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().