Urban flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and multiple decision tree-based machine learning models

Hemal Dey, Wanyun Shao (), Hamid Moradkhani, Barry D. Keim and Brad G. Peter
Additional contact information
Hemal Dey: University of Alabama
Wanyun Shao: University of Alabama
Hamid Moradkhani: University of Alabama
Barry D. Keim: Louisiana State University
Brad G. Peter: University of Arkansas

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2024, vol. 120, issue 11, No 40, 10365-10393

Abstract: Abstract Machine learning (ML) models, particularly decision tree (DT)-based algorithms, are being increasingly utilized for flood susceptibility mapping. To evaluate the advantages of DT-based ML models over traditional statistical models on flood susceptibility assessment, a comparative study is needed to systematically compare the performances of DT- based ML models with that of traditional statistical models. New Orleans, which has a long history of flooding and is highly susceptible to flooding, is selected as the test bed. The primary purpose of this study is to compare the performance of multiple DT-based ML models namely DT, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting (GdBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Random Forest (RF) models with a traditional statistical model known as Frequency Ratio (FR) model in New Orleans. This study also aims to identify the main drivers contributing to flooding in New Orleans using the best performing model. Based on the most recent Hurricane Ida-induced flood inventory map and nine crucial flood conditioning factors, the models’ accuracies are tested and compared using multiple evaluation metrics. The findings of this study indicate that all DT-based ML models perform better compared to FR. The RF model emerges as the best model (AUC = 0.85) among all DT-based ML models in every evaluation metrics. This study then adopts the RF model to simulate flood susceptibility map (FSM) of New Orleans and compares it with the prediction of FR model. The RF model also demonstrates that low elevation and higher precipitation are the main factors responsible for flooding in New Orleans. Therefore, this comparative approach offers a significant understanding about the advantages of advanced ML models over traditional statistical models in local flood susceptibility assessment.

Keywords: Flood susceptibility mapping; Machine learning; Random forest; Frequency ratio; New Orleans (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06609-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06609-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06609-x

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().