Characterization of historical megathrust earthquake ruptures in Central Chile using logic tree analysis

Javiera San Martín (), Ignacia Calisto (), Jorge Quezada (), Daniel Stewart (), Lisa Ely (), Rodrigo Cifuentes-Lobos () and Marcos Moreno ()
Additional contact information
Javiera San Martín: University of Concepcion
Ignacia Calisto: University of Concepcion
Jorge Quezada: Universidad de Concepción
Daniel Stewart: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso
Lisa Ely: Central Washington University
Rodrigo Cifuentes-Lobos: University of Concepcion
Marcos Moreno: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2024, vol. 120, issue 6, No 18, 5427 pages

Abstract: Abstract Characterizing the spatial distribution of ruptures from historical and recent earthquakes is key to understanding the seismic cycle of large earthquakes in subduction zones, and thus to assessing the potential risks associated with future earthquakes. Central Chile (35 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S–38 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S) has been repeatedly affected by large earthquakes, such as the 2010 Maule (Mw 8.8) and the 1835 earthquakes witnessed by Robert Fitzroy (HMS Beagle captain). Here, we identify the rupture pattern and tsunami propagation of the 1751, 1835, and 2010 mega-earthquakes, events that overlapped in central Chile, by compiling historical records and applying robust statistical tools. We used an adaptation of a logic tree methodology to generate random sources of slip distribution for each event, constrained by tsunami and vertical deformation data. We find that the three events studied have different slip peaks. The 1751 earthquake has the largest slip with a maximum patch of $$\sim$$ ∼ 26 m, while the 2010 and 1835 earthquakes reach slips of $$\sim$$ ∼ 16 m and $$\sim$$ ∼ 10 m, respectively. Our results show that a part of the margin between 36 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S and 37 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S was consistently affected by large earthquakes, but with different slip and depth. The shallower depths of the megathrust north of 36 $$^{\circ }$$ ∘ S accumulated energy for at least 300 years, which was released by the 2010 earthquake. Our results provide important constraint for rupture patterns and spatial relationships between historical and recent earthquakes, thus extending the time scale for seismic slip distribution analyses over multiple cycles and contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of seismic hazards.

Keywords: Seismic cycle; Tsunami model; Megathrust earthquake; Slip distribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06404-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06404-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06404-8

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().