Determination of meaningful block sizes for rockfall modelling

Mariella Illeditsch () and Alexander Preh
Additional contact information
Mariella Illeditsch: Vienna University of Technology
Alexander Preh: Vienna University of Technology

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2024, vol. 120, issue 6, No 30, 5685-5710

Abstract: Abstract The determination of the so-called design block is one of the central elements of the Austrian guideline for rockfall protection ONR 24810. It is specified as a certain percentile (P95–P98, depending on the event frequency) of a recorded block size distribution. Block size distributions may be determined from the detachment area (in situ block size distribution) and/or from the deposition area (rockfall block size distribution). Deposition areas, if present, are generally accessible and measurable without technical aids. However, most measuring methods are subjective, uncertain, not verifiable, or inaccurate. Also, rockfall blocks are often fragmented due to the preceding fall process. The in situ block size distribution is (also) required for meaningful rockfall modelling. The statistical method seems to be the most efficient and cost-effective method to determine in situ block size distributions with many blocks within the whole range of block sizes. In the current literature, joint properties are often described by the lognormal and exponential distribution functions. Today, we can model synthetic rock masses on the basis of discrete fracture networks. They statistically describe the geometric properties of the joint sets. This way, we can carry out exact rock mass block surveys and determine in situ block size distributions. We wanted to know whether the in situ block size distributions derived from the synthetic rock mass models can be described by probability distribution functions, and if so, how well. We fitted various distribution functions to three determined in situ block size distributions of different lithologies. We compared their correlations using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and the mean-squared error method. We show that the generalized exponential distribution function best describes the in situ block size distributions across various lithologies compared to 78 other distribution functions. This could lead to more certain, accurate, verifiable, holistic, and objective results. Further investigations are required.

Keywords: Rock fall; Block size distribution; Design block; Joint spacing; Persistence; Joint size; Discrete joint network; Synthetic rock mass model; Probability distribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06432-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06432-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06432-4

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().