Measuring hazard-free improved shelter across the regions of India

Nawaj Sarif (), A. H. Sruthi Anil Kumar (), Papai Barman (), Md. Juel Rana () and Sunil Saha ()
Additional contact information
Nawaj Sarif: International Institute for Population Sciences
A. H. Sruthi Anil Kumar: International Institute for Population Sciences
Papai Barman: International Institute for Population Sciences
Md. Juel Rana: A Constituent Institute of the University of Allahabad
Sunil Saha: University of Gour Banga

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2024, vol. 120, issue 7, No 25, 6533-6549

Abstract: Abstract Global climate change poses an increasingly dire threat to habitats, livelihoods, and communities worldwide. This cross-sectional study has tried to examine the state of improved shelter facilities in India, utilizing the comprehensive methodology outlined by UN-Habitat and NFHS-5 data. The findings of our research alarm that 39.3% of India’s population lacks access to improved shelter. Moreover, a significant disparity in the availability of improved shelter facilities is observed across various states in India. In regions prone to hazards such as floods and earthquakes, there is a considerable lag in terms of improved shelter provisions. On the other hand, non-hazardous areas demonstrate relatively higher rates of access to improved shelter. Our study reveals a marked distinction between improved shelter and hazard-free improved shelter estimates. In India, only 40.6% of the population can be considered safe from the perils of floods, landslides, and earthquakes. However, the situation is considerably worse in rural areas, where both improved shelter and hazard-free improved shelter are scarce. This highlights the urgent need to adopt hazard-free improved shelter as a more refined metric for housing, as it can prove instrumental in guiding effective planning and policymaking initiatives. To ensure a risk-free living environment for future generations, it is imperative to undertake micro-level vulnerability mapping and conduct comprehensive risk assessments for various hazards. Furthermore, the government must take proactive measures to promote resilient housing infrastructure as a crucial component of sustainable development.

Keywords: Housing; Improved shelter; Hazard-free improved shelter; Multi-hazard; Vulnerability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06522-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06522-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06522-3

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().