Monitoring the drought in Southern Africa from space-borne GNSS-R and SMAP data

Komi Edokossi (), Shuanggen Jin (), Usman Mazhar (), Iñigo Molina (), Andres Calabia () and Irfan Ullah ()
Additional contact information
Komi Edokossi: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Shuanggen Jin: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Usman Mazhar: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Iñigo Molina: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Andres Calabia: University of Alcala
Irfan Ullah: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2024, vol. 120, issue 8, No 39, 7947-7967

Abstract: Abstract Drought, a highly detrimental natural disaster, poses significant threats to both human populations, wildlife, and vegetation. Traditional methods of monitoring soil moisture levels rely on ground-based measurements from meteorological stations. However, these stations often lack comprehensive coverage in certain agricultural areas, necessitating the use of alternative methods such as satellite remote sensing. This technique provides a reliable means of measuring soil moisture, a critical factor in effective agricultural management. This paper investigates variations in soil moisture and drought using data from the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) and the Soil Moisture Active and Passive (SMAP) system. To evaluate the accuracy of these data products, we compared both datasets with the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) NOAH model from 2018 to 2019. Our findings reveal a strong correlation between the datasets and the model, with Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of approximately r = 0.98 and RMSE = 0.03 for SMAP, and r = 0.97 and RMSE = 0.02 for CYGNSS, respectively. We further compared these measurement datasets with drought indicators such as the Standardized Precipitation Index over three months (SPI3), the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Total Water Storage (TWS). The correlation coefficients between SMAP and the three indicators (NDVI, SPI3, and TWS) were 0.93, 0.84, and 0.047, respectively, while the coefficients between CYGNSS and the same indicators were 0.86, 0.78, and 0.56, respectively. All the variables also exhibited significant p-values. Despite minor differences, the results demonstrate excellent agreement. Our findings underscore the sensitivity of space-based sensors to drought conditions, highlighting their effectiveness as tools for detecting and monitoring drought (e.g. agricultural drought), particularly in the short term.

Keywords: Soil moisture; Drought; Remote sensing; SPI3; NDVI; TWS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06546-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06546-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06546-9

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().