Disparate household recovery outcomes in rural communities: a longitudinal analysis of Hurricane Michael's impact on the Florida Panhandle

Diana Mitsova (), Ann-Margaret Esnard, Monica Escaleras, Alka Sapat and Lilah Besser
Additional contact information
Diana Mitsova: Florida Atlantic University
Ann-Margaret Esnard: Florida Atlantic University
Monica Escaleras: Florida Atlantic University
Alka Sapat: Florida Atlantic University
Lilah Besser: Florida Atlantic University

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2025, vol. 121, issue 10, No 4, 11337-11369

Abstract: Abstract The unequal distribution and impact of disasters in the United States are well documented but there are gaps in scholarship on recovery outcomes in rural communities. We help fill this gap with a longitudinal analysis of self-reported household recovery outcomes in the Florida Panhandle following the destructive Category 5 Hurricane Michael, which made landfall in Mexico Beach, FL, on October 10, 2018. A total of 909 survey responses were collected approximately 5 months after the hurricane made landfall in the fifteen counties designated by FEMA as eligible for both individual and public assistance. The survey was conducted via Automated Telephone Interviewing (ATI) (landlines) (n = 451) and online (n = 458). The two samples were merged using propensity score matching. Five months after Hurricane Michael made landfall, more than 40% of the respondents said they fully recovered, 21.7% mostly recovered, 23.7% somewhat recovered, and 9.1% reported not recovering. The respondents from the ATI sample were recontacted with a follow-up survey 17 months after the hurricane's landfall. The panel data consisted of 156 respondents who were matched across the two phone surveys. Most participants (64%) in the matched sample reported they had recovered, while 34% did not. The results from a fitted random-intercept logistic regression model indicated that the severity of the damage, extended power outages, income loss, and difficulties getting access to food, fuel, and basic services had highly significant inverse associations with reported positive recovery outcomes. Homeowners' insurance had a highly significant positive association with recovery. Concerns over shortages of food supplies and fuel showed inverse associations with recovery. Compared to those who received disaster assistance, the odds of recovery for those whose applications were denied or still pending were significantly lower. The results help inform disaster management planning, policies, and practices to improve disaster recovery outcomes.

Keywords: Matched panel data; Recovery; Power outages; Disaster assistance; Rural–urban divide Hurricane Michael (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07231-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07231-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07231-1

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().